Search for: "SNAPS Holding Company"
Results 1 - 20
of 407
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Nov 2018, 8:40 am
Developing and implementing a system for snap removal will help ensure that your company can take full advantage of its right to be in federal court, if applicable, when the next lawsuit rolls in. [read post]
31 Jul 2017, 11:58 am
On January 12, 2006, the parties executed a memorandum of understanding in which Cox agreed ‘to promote and market [SNAP] in exchange for obtaining an equity stake’ in the company. [read post]
14 May 2021, 8:16 am
The following article will discuss two recent cases in which plaintiffs attempted to hold Snapchat (Snap, Inc.) responsible for its alleged role in contributing to car accidents. [read post]
30 Jan 2014, 5:25 am
After the rope snapped, strong winds grabbed hold of the teenage girls and slammed them into a condominium building, a power line, and a parked car. [read post]
27 Nov 2022, 7:01 am
Snap: the claims here are predicated on holding Snap liable for third party content posted on its platform. [read post]
3 May 2013, 12:04 pm
Should the manufacturer of these snap caps be found liable in the serious injuries of Ty Landers, his parents may elect to hold the company civilly liable. [read post]
3 May 2018, 5:00 am
Shortly before snap elections were announced, Turkey’s largest remaining independent media company was sold to a businessman with close ties to the government. [read post]
31 Aug 2011, 5:46 am
Google Patents: Google Inc's blockbuster acquisition of Motorola Mobility Holdings Inc underscores a trend by technology companies to snap up patents in a bid to stave off competitive threats and patent-infringement lawsuits. [read post]
27 Apr 2010, 10:50 am
(Jeff Neuburger covers the 9th Circuit's recent ruling in LVRC Holdings, LLC v. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 2:16 pm
Ashley Adams, a spokeswoman for Snap Inc., conveyed that the company would “continue to defend” itself in court. [read post]
27 Jan 2024, 8:27 am
Nevertheless, the gambit successfully navigates around Section 230 because: Plaintiffs here argue that Snap breached a duty to provide information about Joshi to law enforcement….Plaintiffs’ claims for Snap’s failure to respond to requests from law enforcement do not, “at bottom,” seek to hold Snap liable for Joshi’s content—they are focused squarely on Snap’s own conduct. [read post]
19 Dec 2023, 10:35 am
The lower court was unpersuaded: “Doe’s negligent design claim similarly aims to hold Snap liable for communications exchanged between Doe and Guess-Mazock. [read post]
5 Jan 2024, 2:08 pm
In recent legal developments, dozens of families have embarked on a journey for justice against Snap Inc., the parent company of Snapchat. [read post]
12 May 2021, 9:15 am
Restating the Holding. [read post]
7 Apr 2018, 6:59 am
By offering stock in the company with no shareholder vote at all, Snap—the company behind the popular mobile-messaging app Snapchat (that is all about giving a voice to the many)—has acknowledged that public voting power at controlled companies is only a fiction. [read post]
16 Sep 2010, 7:24 am
Yesterday's New York Times story on directors who presided over corporate failures being snapped up as directors by other companies (see here) did exactly what the authors (Susanne Craig and Peter Lattman) intended. [read post]
18 Mar 2024, 4:22 pm
The trial court disagreed, narrowly interpreting Section 230 and erroneously holding that the plaintiffs were merely trying to hold the company responsible for its own “independent tortious conduct—independent, that is, of the drug sellers’ posted content. [read post]
20 Aug 2017, 10:06 am
The Blue Apron IPO and Lawsuit The shares of Blue Apron Holdings, a meal-kit delivery company, began trading on the New York Stock Exchange on June 29, 2017. [read post]
30 Jan 2015, 2:30 pm
Snap decision. [read post]
3 Mar 2017, 7:40 am
However, a company called Mojo Media filed a similar “tap and hold” patent application shortly thereafter. [read post]
